June 2006 |
Issue 006
Welcome
to the sixth edition of the African Terrorism Bulletin. The
quarterly newsletter is produced by the Organised Crime and Money
Laundering Programme of the Institute for Security Studies (ISS).
The aim is to provide balanced information, analysis and critical
perspectives regarding news on terrorism and counter-terrorism
strategies on the African continent.
The information in this
and future African Terrorism Bulletins will be based on ‘open
source’ information. Commenting on developments relating to
terrorism remains a sensitive issue. The Bulletin will endeavour to
steer through the different agendas that form part of the discourse
on terrorism in a critical and balanced way. Different sections
focus on terrorism in the news, state responses and critical
perspectives. Most of the information focuses on issues around
terrorism as they relate to the African continent, yet, due to the
transnational nature of the phenomenon, issues from further afield
are not ignored.
Comments, contributions and critiques from
our readers are encouraged. Please feel free to pass this newsletter
on to anyone who you think may be interested in the content of the
African Terrorism Bulletin. To subscribe or comment, please send an
e-mail to [email protected] .
Extraordinary rendition or
deportation?
Taylor appears before
special court
Somalia: the next
round
Bin Laden calls for jihad
in Sudan’s Darfur region
Boeremag accused
escape
New Swazi firebombing
targets police flat
Annan outlines his
counter-terrorism strategy to General
Assembly
Libya is taken off the US
terror list
Zimbabwe unveils new
terrorism laws
Egyptian police kill
Sinai bombing suspect
al Qaeda suspect
freed
Uganda deports US
evangelist accused of terrorism
“Africa lacks capacity to counter terrorism
threat “
Kikambala suspect jailed
for eight years
Anti-terrorism laws
abused
Call for contributions:
ASR 15.3
New counter-terrorism
programme and ISS office in Addis Ababa
launched
ISS seminar on 23 June
2006: Dr William Rosenau from the RAND
Corporation
Trojan Horses? USAID,
counter-terrorism and Africa’s police
South
African readers will have followed the media frenzy surrounding the
‘disappearance’ of Pakistani national Rashid Khalid from South
Africa last November. We carried the story in the last newsletter.
Back then, the mysterious disappearance was clouded in smokescreens
and we put forth that it was high time that the South African
Department of Home Affairs played open cards. What has changed since
March? According to Rashid’s lawyer not much. Home Affairs still
maintains that Rashid was legally deported out of the country. It
says that there were allegations that Rashid had connections with
international terrorist cells, but there were insufficient grounds
to extradite him. However, there were grounds to deport him as he
was in fact an illegal foreigner within the borders of South Africa.
If Rashid were indeed a terror suspect, then he should have
been arrested and taken through the proper legal channels. South
Africa has an anti-terrorism law, the Protection of Constitutional
Democracy against Terrorist and Related Activities Act since May
2005. Perhaps it could have been applied in this case? The
uncertainties surrounding the Rashid case call to question whether
the South African government acted within the parameters of the
Constitution and Bill of Rights.
To this day, it remains
unclear whether Rashid was simply an illegal immigrant, a terror
suspect or perhaps even a wrongly identified terror suspect. The
silence on this matter seems to point to the later two options.
Perhaps even a case of rendition?
One is reminded of the case
of Haroon Rashid Aswat, the alleged mastermind of the London
bombings. Aswat was resident in South Africa and worked undetected
in the Johannesburg suburb of Fordsburg in the late 1990s. Aswat’s
mobile phone received about twenty calls from the London bombing
suspects. Furthermore, a charge filed before a New York court
accused Aswat of seeking to establish a terrorist training camp in a
remote area in the north-western US state of Oregon, hostage taking
in Yemen and funding terrorist training in Afghanistan.
Aswat
had been on the run since 1999. Following his arrest in Zambia,
British officials were anxious to interview Aswat because of
concerns that he could be taken to one of the US terrorist detention
centers. This, after Martin Mubangu, a British Muslim, was arrested
in Zambia in 2002 and taken to the US detention camp in Guatanamo
Bay, where he was held until his release without charge in
2005.
In the end, Zambia deported Aswat, who is a British
citizen back to London in August 2005. The central African nation
turned down a US request for Aswat’s extradition, citing that the
suspect was a British national and it would hence be proper to hand
him over to the British government. Presently, the South African
Department of Home Affairs claims that they deported an illegal
immigrant from the country. There seems nothing wrong with this
procedure on the face of it. However, it is surprising that a
special aircraft, the Gulfstream II jet, arrived on South African
soil to fly the illegal immigrant out of the country.
In the
aftermath of Aswat’s arrest it transpired that American intelligence
officials attempted to seize the terror suspect in South Africa a
few weeks earlier, and secretly shift him to an undisclosed third
country for interrogation. British officials were unwilling to
participate in the American policy of the “rendition” of one of
their own citizens. Is this ‘attempt’ by the Americans perhaps an
indication that South Africa allows renditions in her
territory?
Rendition flights have become one of the most
controversial aspects of the US-led “War on Terror”. They entail
alleged terror suspects being taken by the US intelligence agencies
for interrogation to secret facilities in other
countries.
Last week, a Council of Europe report found that
fourteen European countries worked with the CIA in the secret
transfer of terrorism suspects. We wait to hear from the South
African government whether it has become complicit in rendition
flights, which would most certainly fall outside the ambit of the
country’s modern Constitution.
Please refer to our TOP
STORY
Extraordinary
rendition or deportation?
June
12 2006- The family of Pakistani national Rashid Khalid, his lawyer
and concerned citizens of South Africa have been trying to establish
his whereabouts since his disappearance in November of last year.
The Mail & Guardian newspaper has reported that the façade of
legality around the deportation of Khalid was crumbling.
In
latest developments, the South African Department of Home Affairs
appeared to have been asked by the police crime intelligence
division to provide legal cover for Rashid’s arrest and handover to
Pakistani authorities. The same department has also been dragging
its feet in providing details of Rashid’s ‘deportation’, maintaining
that he was taken out of the country for residing in South Africa
illegally. Rashid, with suspected links to international terror
networks, was arrested by police officers in Eastcourt,
KwaZulu-Natal on October 31, 2005 and held for seven days before
being flown out of Waterkloof air force base on a private
jet.
The Gulfstream II jet is owned by AVE, a company whose
main base of operations is Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates. The
company is the latest incarnation of Phoenix Aviation, a firm which
has been linked to the notorious Russian arms dealer and smuggler
Victor Bout. Also known as “The Merchant of Death”, Bout’s large
fleet of aircraft was used to ship illegal arms to many dictators
and rebel forces. This was often done in direct contravention of
United Nations embargos.Zehir Omar, Rashid’s lawyer, has asked the
International Criminal Court to investigate the disappearance from
South Africa of Khalid Rashid. The family and friends of Rashid fear
that he may have become a victim of an ‘extraordinary rendition’ and
may have been taken to an international detention center.
Read the
Mail & Guardian article
Read the
Mail & Guardian article
Read the
ISS Today commentary
Read the
story in the last African Terrorism Bulletin
Taylor
appears before special court
May
02 2006 –Former Liberian President Charles Taylor refused to
recognise an international war crimes court in Sierra Leone and
pleaded not guilty to the multiple charges against him. He is facing
eleven counts of war crimes, crimes against humanity and other
charges including terrorism, murder, r ape, enslavement and the use
of child soldiers for his role in Sierra Leone’s 1991-2002 civil
war.
Created in 2002 through an agreement between the United
Nations and the Sierra Leonean government, the Special Court is
charged with bringing to justice those who bear the greatest
responsibility for grave crimes committed since 1996.
The
indictment against Taylor alleges that the former warlord provided
training to and helped finance the revolutionary United Front (RUF)
in preparation for RUF armed action in Sierra Leone and during the
subsequent conflict there. Taylor was elected president of Liberia
in 1997 after a seven-year civil war. He soon gained international
notoriety for his forces’ brutal abuse of civilians and for his use
of child soldiers organised in “Small Boy Units”. Taylor’s support
for the RUF in Sierra Leone contributed to the deaths, r apes and
mutilations of thousands of civilians there. In 2003, Taylor left
Liberia for N igeria, where he was offered asylum.
After
Taylor’s disappearance from Calabar, N igeria in March 2006, N
igerian authorities later arrested him on the border with Cameroon.
Wanted for his role in supporting Sierra Leone’s rebel forces,
Taylor was then placed on a plane headed for Monrovia, where UN
authorities took him into custody for transport to the Special Court
for Sierra Leone in Freetown.
Taylor is the first former
president on African soil to answer charges of crimes against
humanity.
Read the
Worldpress article
Read the
Human Rights Watch
report
Somalia:
the next round
June
13 2006-Somali leaders have met with regional government ministers
to find means to empower Somalia’s United Nations-backed government,
which watched from the sidelines as fundamentalist Islamic militia
battled warlords and seized its capital. The summit in the Kenyan
capital was part of an international diplomatic effort to restore a
government to Somalia. Yet, Jean-Jacques Cornish from the Mail &
Guardian newspaper warns that Somalia might become “the new
Afghanistan”.
This is particularly poignant in light of US
President George W Bush’s recent remarks: “The first concern, of
course, would be to make sure that Somalia does not become an al
Qaeda safe haven. Somalia mustn’t become a place from which
terrorists can plot and plan. When there’s instability anywhere in
the world, we’re concerned. And there is instability in
Somalia.”
These remarks may explain why for some months the
US has intervened in the Horn of Africa nation by providing
clandestine financial support for secular faction leaders under the
banner of the Alliance for the Restoration of Peace and
Counter-Terrorism who oppose Islamic fundamentalist militia. The
transitional Somali president has repeatedly denounced this funding,
insisting that the US should be playing a more even-handed role in
restoring democracy to Somalia.
After a month of fighting,
which cost more than 300 lives and injured about 1700 people, mainly
civilians, the US-backed warlords took a beating when Mogadishu feel
to Islamist warlords during the first weekend of
June.
Somalia has been without effective government since
1991, when warlords overthrew long-time dictator Siad Barre and then
turned on one another. Presently, many of the former warlords are
members of the transitional government, while the Islamic leaders
portray themselves as a force capable of restoring order and setting
Somalia on a new path. The transitional government has made little
progress toward asserting any authority in the war-torn country. Its
seat is in the southern city of Baidoa, as Mogadishu is considered
unsafe.
Read the
Mail & Guardian article
Read the
Mail & Guardian
article
Bin
Laden calls for jihad in Sudan’s Darfur
region
April
24 2006 – Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden has called on his
followers to prepare for jihad against Western would-be occupiers in
Sudan’s Darfur region. An audiotape attributed to Bin Laden declared
that the West’s shunning of the Hamas Palestinian government showed
it was waging a Crusader-Zionist war on Muslims. After accusing the
West of seeking to divide Sudan, bin Laden urged “mujahideen (holy
warriors) and their supporters in Sudan and the Arabian Peninsula to
prepare all that is necessary to wage a long term-war against the
Crusaders in western Sudan. “
The Sudanese government was
quick to distance itself from the Bin Laden recording, which also
accused the US of planning to occupy the country and plunder it of
its oil reserves.Since fighting flared between the Sudan Armed
Forces and the rebel Sudan Liberation Army (SLA) in North Darfur at
the end of February, a large number of villages have been attacked
and burned, markets have been looted and people displaced.
Meanwhile, distrust of the United Nations and warnings of al Qaeda
involvement are growing in the war-torn country.
Read the
UN News article
Read the
Scoop article
Boeremag
accused escape
May
12 2006 – At least forty heavily armed police officers failed to
notice that two accused in the Boeremag trial went missing in the
Pretoria High Court. It is not clear how the men escaped from police
custody. They failed to reach their cell during a lunch recess. The
two are among the 21 men facing high treason, murder and terrorism
charges after a series of bomb blasts in Soweto and Bronkhorstspruit
in 2001. The South African Police Service has launched an internal
investigation to look into whether the two were assisted in their
escape.
Herman van Rooyen and Rudi Gouws have been placed on
Interpol`s international database of wanted fugitives. If found
within Interpol`s 184-member countries, the two would be arrested
and extradited for prosecution.
Read the
iafrica.com article
Read the
story in the last African Terrorism
Bulletin
New
Swazi firebombing targets police flat
March
28 2006 - A police officer’s flat was firebombed in eastern
Swaziland in late March. This was the first incident since the
release on bail of sixteen members of the banned opposition People’s
United Democratic Movement (Pudemo). The movement is calling for an
end to the autocratic rule of King Mswati III, Africa’s last
absolute monarch.
Arrested during sweeps in December and
January, the Pudemo members are accused of high treason and could
face the death penalty for allegedly carrying out a series of
firebombings on government offices and residences of senior state
employees since October.
No trial date has been set in the
case and the accused were released on March 10, after the state
failed to make a convincing case.
Three of the accused
stated that they were attacked by about fifty prison warders on the
eve of their bail hearing. Meanwhile, the court also heard that nine
of the sixteen defendants had been mistreated since their arrest in
December.
Read the
Mail & Guardian article
Read the
Mail & Guardian
article
Annan
outlines his counter-terrorism strategy to General
Assembly
May 2
2006-United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan has presented his
recommendations for the world’s first comprehensive
counter-terrorism strategy to the UN General Assembly. Entitled
“Uniting Against Terrorism: Recommendations for a Global
Counter-Terrorism Strategy”, the report builds on ideas outlined in
Spain in 2005 on the one-year anniversary of the train bombings that
killed and maimed more than 1600 people. Underpinning the global
strategy are Annan’s ‘five D’s’:
- Dissuading people
from resorting to terrorism or supporting
it;
- Denying terrorists
the means to carry out an attack;
- Deterring states from
supporting terrorism;
- Developing state
capacity to defeat terrorism, and
- Defending human
rights.
Annan
assisted by a multi-agency counter-terrorism task force lays out
specific recommendations in the report under the “5 D’s”. Included
is a call on UN member states to consider holding a global forum on
biotechnology, as part of strategy to prevent the use of biological
weapons.
The head of the world body also called for the
conclusion “as soon as possible” of a comprehensive convention on
international terrorism.
Download
the UN News report
Download
the report of the UN
General-Secretary
Libya
is taken off the US terror list
May
16 2006 – After hovering over a quarter-century on the United
States’ list of ‘State Sponsors of Terrorism, Libya has finally been
taken off the list. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in her
announcement of the US-Libya restoration of diplomatic relations
said, “Libya was rewarded for its renunciation of terrorism and
cooperation in the US-led ‘war on terror’.” The reopening of the US
embassy in Libya’s capital Tripoli will mark the restoration of
diplomatic ties. The United States withdrew its last ambassador to
Libya in 1972, and took out its remaining personnel when the embassy
was set alight by a mob in 1979. Less than two years later all
Libyan diplomats were expelled from Washington. The designation of
being a ‘state sponsor of terrorism’ triggers economic and
diplomatic sanctions.
Read the
News24 article
Read the
story in the last African Terrorism Bulletin
Zimbabwe
unveils new terrorism laws
April
24 2006 – The Zimbabwean government has published a proposed new
law.The Suppression of Foreign and International Terrorism Bill
comes in the wake of the brief detention earlier this month of
opposition members and police officers who later had charges of
stocking arms and plotting to assassinate President Robert Mugabe
dropped. Authorities had accused the men of working with a
foreign-based organisation called the Zimbabwean Freedom Movement,
which was said to be plotting to end Mugabe’s rule.
The
Zimbabwean government stated that it had suffered embarrassment
after terrorism charges could not be sustained in high profile cases
in the past. In an effort to avoid such legal embarrassment in
future, the Ministry of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs had
come up with a Bill that was set to make it easier for the state to
secure conviction of terror suspects. Proponents of the new bill
also said that international terrorism was not adequately addressed
by existing laws, nor was the problem of mercenary activities
covered.
Under the proposed legislation, it would be an
offence to undergo training for foreign or international terrorism,
to recruit persons to undergo such training, or to possess weaponry
that would be used for the purposes of foreign or international
terrorist activity. The Minister of Home Affairs would identify and
ban terrorist organisations.
Critics of the draft bill are
suspicious, singling out the government’s free interpretation of the
definition of terrorism. It is feared that the legislation may be
applied to rein in Mugabe’s opponents.
Given the ZANU-PF
party’s majority, the proposed law is likely to sail through
parliament.
Read the
Zimbabwean Standard
article
Egyptian
police kill Sinai bombing suspect
May
09 2006 – Egyptian police have killed the suspected leader of an
underground grouping, who was wanted for the Sinai bombings that
claimed twenty-four lives on 17 April 2006. 62 people were wounded.
Police found automatic rifles and hand-grenades at the scene. Nasser
Khamis el-Mallahi was the seventh person killed since police and
soldiers fanned across the Sinai peninsula to hunt down terror
suspects in Dahab bombings.
There had been no claim of
responsibility for the bombings apart from that al Qaeda leaders had
called for attacks on western targets in an audiotape released the
weekend before the incident. Preliminary investigations pointed to
links between the attacks in Dahab and two previous strikes in the
Sinai peninsula over the past eighteen months. The bombers struck on
Sham el-Nessim, a traditional holiday that marks the beginning of
spring, and a day before Sinai Liberation Day, which celebrates
Israel’s withdrawal from the peninsula in 1982. Egyptian authorities
maintain that all the Sinai bombings have been the work of a single
organisation with no connections abroad and no link to al
Qaeda.
Following the bombings, Egypt announced that it was
extending the emergency law for another two years following the
Sinai terror attacks. Commentators question the usefulness of
repressive security measures. Anne Penketh of The Independent doubts that
Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak can avert future terror attacks.
Tourists in Egypt are already escorted by armed guards and
barricaded behind concrete blocks in their resorts.
Read the
Independent article
Read the
Washington Post
article
al
Qaeda suspect freed
April
18 2006 – Jamal Kiyemba, a Ugandan terror suspect with links to the
al Qaeda network, has been freed by Ugandan security
forces.
Kiyemba was captured in Pakistan in 2002 on suspicion
of being an al Qaeda terrorist. He was jailed in Pakistan,
Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay. Upon his release from Guantanamo
Bay, UK authorities denied him entry into London, where his mother
lived. He was subsequently deported to Uganda, where he was confined
to a ‘safe house’ for two months.
Kiyemba joined the Taliban
in Pakistan, where he was seized and turned over to the US for a
bounty of $5 000. Kiyemba claims the American interrogators forced
him to confess to terrorist activities, and that MI5 questioned him
repeatedly about British terror suspects and jailed clerics Abu
Hamza and Abu Qatada. He was freed without warning as international
pressure mounted on America to close the detention camp after a
highly critical UN report on the treatment of prisoners there was
released.
Human Rights campaigners in the UK are uncertain
about Kiyemba’s safety in Uganda and have called for his return.
Having grown up with his family in the UK, Kiyemba felt more British
than Ugandan, and had asked the UK government to help him return to
his family.
Read the
New Vision article
Uganda
deports US evangelist accused of terrorism
April
18 2006 – And in more news from Uganda, government authorities have
deported an American evangelist who was charged with terrorism after
detectives found assault rifles and bullets hidden in his bedroom
just days before Uganda’s national elections. Peter Waldron had
worked previously as an IT consultant for the Ugandan Health
Ministry. He then founded an evangelical group and was allegedly
planning to start a political party based on Christian principles at
the time of his arrest. Friends of Waldron claim that he was
detained because of a critical newsletter that was stamped
‘defamatory’ by state authorities. Uganda denies this. However,
copies of The Africa
Dispatch were confiscated. It contains Waldon’s feature
article about the violent government responses to riots following
the detention of opposition leader Kizza Besigye last year.
Previously, family and friends of Waldron appealed to President
Yoweri Museveni and wife Janet to help secure his
release.
Charges against six fellow suspects were
subsequently dropped. All seven had denied the terrorism
charges.
Read the
article on About.com
“Africa
lacks capacity to counter terrorism threat “
April
28 2006 –According to Ibrahim Gambari, the UN
Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, many African
countries plagued by the continuing threat of terrorism, lacked the
means to counter the threat. Gambari delivered his speech at a
symposium organised by the UN Department of Political Affairs and
the Africa-America Institute. The terrorist threat to Africa was
underscored by the attacks in Nairobi , Mombassa and Dar es Salaam,
and the terror warnings in Kenya and elsewhere in East Africa
earlier this year. Africa had taken steps to deal with terrorism,
with 36 of the 53 countries in the African Union (AU) having
ratified the Convention on the Prevention and Combating of
Terrorism.
Similarly, the African Centre for the Study and
Research on Terrorism had been established in Algeria. Apart from
building capacity in Africa, Gambari said that the fight against
terrorism should also aim at reducing the environment, which allowed
terrorists to recruit and thrive.
Gambari’s remarks are
echoed in the latest annual report on terrorism by the US State
Department. Reference is made to the ‘relatively weak’ capacity of
the African Union to support counter-terrorism efforts.
Read the
Angola Press report
Read the
Voice of America
article
Kikambala
suspect jailed for eight years
April
04 2006 – One of the four men acquitted of the murder of fifteen
people following the bombing of the Paradise Hotel in Kikambala,
Kenya has been sentenced to eight years of imprisonment. Omar Said
Omar was found guilty of possession of five firearms, explosives and
ammunitions without a firearm certificate.
Omar’s freedom
was short-lived in June 2005, when the police re-arrested him
moments after the High Court cleared him of murder charges relating
to the Kikambala bombing.
Read the
KBC article
Anti-terrorism
laws abused
April
03 2006 – An independent panel of eminent jurists appointed by the
International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) held a two day East
African Regional hearing in Nairobi. This forms part of a global
inquiry into the effects of counter-terrorism measures on human
rights and the rule of law.Former chief justice of South Africa
Justice Arthur Chaskalson chairs the panel, which heard
presentations from leading legal and human rights experts from
Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. The jurists took interest in
justifications given for counter-terrorism laws, policies and
practices, especially where they depart from the ordinary legal
framework. In some countries, the post 9/11 climate has been
exploited to justify longstanding human rights violations carried
out in the name of national security.
In particular,
following a spate of bombings in Kampala in 1999, Uganda’s
legislature enacted the Anti Terrorism Act of 2002 as a legal
measure to counter the threat of terrorism. The Act provides an
extremely wide definition of what constitutes an act of
terrorism.
When convicted under this law, a person can suffer
various penalties including death, and serve lengthy prison terms.
One of the key areas where this particular piece of legislation has
negatively impacted on human rights is the government’s policy of
having multiple security agencies all charged with the enforcement
of the Act.
The ICJ suggests that safe guarding persons from
terrorist acts and respecting human rights and humanitarian law
allow states a reasonably wide margin of flexibility to combat
terrorism without contravening human rights and humanitarian legal
obligations.
The ICJ hearings for the North African hub,
which includes Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia and Libya are scheduled
next.
Read the
East Standard article
Visit the
website of the Eminent Jurists Panel
Call
for contributions: ASR 15.3
The
African Security Review 15.3 will reflect the debates and
contributions on terrorism in Africa made at an ISS seminar held in
Dar es Salaam in March 2006. The premise of the seminar was that the
post September 11 international discourse on terrorism had
significantly shaped the world’s perception of terrorism and how it
manifests itself. African voices on this subject have been few and
far between. The seminar provided an opportunity for African
scholars and analysts to develop a better understanding of how
terrorism and its impact are perceived across Africa. Such a debate
is important if African responses to terrorism are to be influenced
by both the lived realities and perspectives from the continent.
Amongst others, the ASR thus will provide African
perspectives on the international terrorism and counter-terrorism
discourse, the problematic relationship between counter-terrorism
measures, human rights considerations and the African state, oil and
terrorism and counter-terrorism approaches in Africa.
We are
seeking three more commentaries (1500-2000 words) that could deal
with
- Terrorism and
development
- Violence versus
terrorism
- State terror as
counter terrorism
Furthermore,
four book reviews (800 -1200 words) in line with the overall topic
are needed. Interested contributors should express their interest,
their topic and/ or the book to be reviewed to Annette Hübschle ( [email protected] )
by no later than 26 June 2006. The deadline for contributions is 17
July 2006.
New
counter-terrorism programme and ISS office in Addis Ababa
launched
June
14 2006-The Institute for Security Studies (ISS) has launched a new
office in the Ethiopian capital of Addis Ababa. At the same time,
the IGAD Counter-Terrorism Programme has commenced its work at the
new ISS office. The programme originates from a plan adopted by the
Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) and is geared
towards its member states, which include Djibouti, Eritrea,
Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, Sudan and Uganda. Back in 2003, the plan
called for concerted action in the following areas:
- Measures to establish
a regional approach to counter-terrorism with a broader
international strategy
- Measures to counter
the financing of terrorism
- Enhancing the
operational capacity to counter illegal cross border
movement
- Enhancing operational
capacity to record and share information
- Ensuring the
protection of human rights in counter-terrorism
operations
- Educational
programmes to enhance public support
The
Counter-Terrorism Programme aims to contribute towards the IGAD
plan.
ISS
seminar on 23 June 2006: Dr William Rosenau from the RAND
Corporation
The
Pretoria office of the ISS is hosting a seminar entitled “Subversion
and insurgency and counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency”. Dr
William Rosenau from the US-based Rand Corporation will be the main
speaker. The seminar will be held in the ISS Conference Room on 23
June 2006, from 10h00 to 13h30. Please confirm your attendance with
Charlene Harry at 012-346 9500 or [email protected] .
Visit the
ISS Africa website for more
information
Trojan
Horses? USAID, counter-terrorism and Africa’s
police
Alice
Hill argues in her Third World
Quarterly contribution that the purpose of US foreign
assistance has shifted in the wake of 2001. The Bush administration
has broadened the remit of the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID) in such a way as to render it a
quasi-security agency. Thus citing the example of Kenya, she regards
using USAID to improve the counter-terrorist capacity of Africa’s
police in the pursuit of US national security objectives a flawed
strategy.
You can access the article from this website
Please inform us of upcoming
terrorism-related meetings, seminars, workshops, conferences,
publications and other developments by sending a message to [email protected]
The
Institute for Security Studies (ISS) is an applied policy non-profit
research organisation with a focus on human security issues on the
African continent.
This newsletter is produced by the
Organised Crime and Money Laundering Programme of the Institute for
Security Studies and funded by the Royal Norwegian Government.
Annette
Hübschle (Researcher: Organised Crime and Money Laundering
Programme) – [email protected]
Luzuko Pupuma (ISS Research
Intern)

Institute
for Security Studies
67
Roeland Street, Drury Lane, Gardens, Cape Town 8001, South
Africa
Tel +27 (0)21 461-7211 • Fax +27 (0)21 461-7213
www.issafrica.org • [email protected]
Please
contact [email protected] to
be added to or removed from this mailing list.
This template
is constructed and managed with Ubuntu
Media`s E-Bean publishing system
|