Monograph 58: Reducing Crime in Durban, A Victim Survey and Safer City Strategy, Rory Robertshaw, Antoinette Louw, Mark Shaw, Mduduzi
The Durban Safer City Project was established in
October 1999 following discussions between the city and officials from
the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) who were
setting up similar initiatives in other parts of the world. The lack of
safety and security was identified as the main threat to the city’s
ability to attract investment and implement its economic growth
strategy.
After extensive consultation both
inside and outside of the council, the strategy was compiled by the
Safer City Project co-ordinators with the help of the Independent
Projects Trust (IPT). The strategy was officially adopted by the Unicity
Committee on 11 October 2000 and implementation could therefore begin.
The Durban Safer City Strategy 2000 has three strategic components, each
complementing the other:
- effective policing and crime prevention
- targeted social crime prevention
- environmental design.
The strategy development process was
preceded by a victim survey conducted by the Institute for Security
Studies. The survey results supplemented the official police crime
statistics and provided data on people’s experiences of crime,
perceptions of safety and policing, and suggestions on how to make the
city safer. The Durban victim survey was the third in a series of six
city victim surveys undertaken by the ISS between 1997 and 2000. The ISS
aimed to assist metropolitan and local government practitioners to
develop crime reduction strategies.
In total, 1 884 people were
interviewed in December 1997 across the Durban metropolitan area. Of
these, 59% said that they had been a victim of at least one crime
between 1993 and 1997. The risk of victimisation varied according to
race, gender and age: women were more at risk than men; African and
coloured residents were more likely to be victims than Asians and
whites; and the youngest and oldest residents were more at risk than
other age groups. Burglary followed by robbery were the two most
prevalent crime types in the Durban metropolitan area.
A majority of victims said they
reported the most recent incident of murder, car theft, hijacking,
burglary and sexual offence to the police. Insurance coverage was not
the main reason for reporting. The occurrence of violence and injuries,
and whether or not a victim knew the offender also played a role. Levels
of satisfaction with police service when reporting a crime were low:
only 38% of victims said they were satisfied.
Victims tended to change their
behaviour to reduce the chances of victimisation in future. With the
exception of assault victims, most changed their behaviour after
victimisation. Typically, African victims were less likely to adopt
precautionary measures than white or Asian victims. This applied across
all types of crime and could relate to the cost of improving security or
changing lifestyle patterns. Those who rely on public transport cannot
always change their routes or purchase a car to avoid victimisation.
Although many victims did change their behaviour, on average, less than
half of them said they felt safer as a result.
Victim support is a crucial part of
helping people to deal with the impact of crime. The type of support
that victims favoured the most was effective policing and emotional
support. However, needs differed across race. African and white victims
were most likely to request emotional support followed by better
policing. More white victims wanted advice, information and counselling
than other victims. Of concern was that less than a third of victims
were familiar with any support services and less than a quarter had used
such services. Victims of sexual offences were most likely to have
heard of these services, to have used them, and to believe that they
would be useful.
Based on perceptions of policing and
other types of protection, the poor were disadvantaged in terms of their
access to safety. The survey indicated that 21% of people had no
protection for their homes at all. White (and wealthier) residents were
much more likely to use physical security measures than African and
coloured residents. For example, 63% of whites and 46% of Asians had
high fences or walls compared to only 1% of Africans. Those most at risk
of crime therefore had the least protection for their homes. Most
whites (80%) and Asians (60%) said that they felt safer as a result of
using these forms of protection. Coloured and African residents were
less positive.
Perceptions of policing differed
significantly across the metropolitan area. Just over half of all
respondents thought the police were doing a poor job at controlling
crime in Durban. White respondents and those living in the inner city
were more likely to be satisfied than Asians, Africans and those living
in informal settlements. The quality of policing appeared to be better
in the wealthier parts of the city and those areas policed by the former
Durban City Police such as the inner city area and surrounding (largely
white) suburbs.
Despite the police’s positive rating
by inner city residents, 53% of all Durban residents thought that the
inner city was the most unsafe part of the metropolitan area. Coloured,
white and Asian respondents were much more likely to hold this view than
were Africans. Fear of crime in the inner city is no doubt based on a
range of concerns, not all of which relate to crime or policing, such as
congestion, overcrowding and litter. The risk of crime may also be
unjustifiably associated with particular groups of people such as street
children and street traders.
Feelings of safety varied according to
where people lived. During the day, only 49% of those living in the
inner city and 51% in informal settlements felt safe, compared to 78% of
those in the suburbs. After dark, only 13% in informal settlements felt
safe compared to 35% in the suburbs. Higher levels of fear in informal
settlements are probably caused by the general lack of services and
infrastructure. This increases the risk of victimisation in an
environment already lacking in basic policing and other systems of
protection and support.
The concept of ‘safety’ was clearly associated with policing
and justice. Although the importance of job creation and development was
recognised, most respondents thought that better policing and criminal
justice would improve safety in the city. The majority (80%) said that
the government should improve the provision of criminal justice, in
particular, the police. White respondents were three and a half times
more likely to call for harsher punishment than Africans. When asked
what they could do to improve their own safety, the most common response
among Africans and whites was ‘work with the police’. People’s
willingness to work with the police and share responsibility for their
own safety is encouraging.