The SAPS e-Docket System
For many years, media reports have continuously highlighted the seriousness of stolen and lost case dockets plaguing the South African Police Service (SAPS).
Bilkis Omar, Researcher, Crime, Justice and Politics Programme, ISS Tshwane (Pretoria)
For many years, media reports have continuously highlighted the
seriousness of stolen and lost case dockets plaguing the South African
Police Service (SAPS).
Bookmark with:
Facebook
del.icio.us
Digg It!

A recent parliamentary response by the Minister of Police, Nathi
Mthetwa, regarding missing case dockets, showed that 688 dockets had
gone missing from stations across the country in the period April 2008
to February 2009. North West Province reported the highest number of
missing dockets at 260, while KwaZulu-Natal reported 132 missing
dockets.
A senior SAPS officer claims that the above numbers are not a true
reflection of the actual numbers of missing or stolen dockets but
reflect only those reported to the provincial commissioners. He avers
that disclosure of larger figures will reflect poorly on station
performance as missing and stolen dockets can be detected during routine
24-hour and monthly inspections, implying that station commissioners
have been remiss in their duty.
It is difficult to determine the exact numbers of stolen or lost
dockets despite disclosure by the SAPS, but it is also clear that the
problem is very prevalent within SAPS.
Earlier this week, a policeman and his police clerk wife, including an
accomplice, were also arrested for corruption related to missing case
dockets. In July, a docket of a woman who was gang-raped went missing
and resurfaced later at the same police station.
Examples such as the above have drawn attention to the SAPS’ reliance
on physical paper dockets, and have cast doubts on the veracity of the
chain of evidence when a docket goes missing and resurfaces. Ultimately
it results in miscarriages of justice for victims and complainants who
depend on the criminal justice system to address their concerns.
In September 2008, the SAPS embarked on an e-docket system aimed at
preventing the theft and sale of dockets as well as the loss of docket
information from police stations. Each case docket is first indexed and
registered on the Crime Administration System (CAS) before being scanned
on a centralised system, accessible at the SAPS Information and System
Management (ISM) component at head office. No scanning images are stored
at station level and once the information has been stored, it cannot be
deleted. The added benefit of the system is the ability of ISM to
undertake audit trails of dockets within the new system.
The e-docket system, still at a developmental stage, has been rolled
out to 143 police stations in seven provinces. Of these, 100 police
stations in Gauteng and 29 police stations in KwaZulu-Natal have
implemented the new system. Provinces such as Free State and Eastern
Cape are still in the preparation phase.
An additional benefit of the system to complainants and the police is
the SMS notification system. This is meant to alleviate much of the
other challenges facing police, and mostly detectives, at stations. It
provides:
-
CAS numbers to complainants once the case is registered
-
Updates on cases to complainants, for example, if the case is
transferred to another investigating officer, this will be communicated
to the complainant via sms.
- Minimal paperwork for the police and eases delivery of information to complainants
While the new system appears systematic and clear-cut, the SAPS have
to caution against possible errors that are likely to surface, such as:
-
The timeframe from receiving a complaint to physically capturing
the data or evidence still allows for corruption or carelessness to
occur
-
Incorrect data capturing of evidence prior to the scanning phase, including cell phone numbers
-
Operational functioning of the system and availability of network capacity
-
Impact of the new system on police members and change management difficulties
-
Sustainability of the system
-
SAPS currently utilises a case management system to monitor
dockets. The suitability of the old system is questionable given the
various dynamics of the new e-docket system.
The SAPS have undertaken a bold step to address a critical problem of
docket theft and loss. The likelihood is strong that the e-docket
system will be successful, and apart from the SAPS, victims and
complainants will be the greatest benefactors.