Monograph 96: The Scorpions. Analysing the Directorate of Special Operations, Jean Redpath
The launch of the “Scorpions” was announced in September 1999,
in the context of a world extremely concerned about the phenomenon of
organised crime. The Scorpions became formally known as the Directorate
of Special Operations (DSO), when the DSO officially came into existence
16 months later, in January 2001. The DSO is the investigative arm of
South Africa’s National Prosecuting Authority. South Africa is quite
distinctive in having this investigative component to a national
prosecuting authority, as well as a national police force.
Although international attention has shifted away from organised
crime somewhat since September 2001, onto the threat of terrorism,
organised crime remains the focus of the DSO. High-profile since its
inception four years ago, the organisation and its staff are generally
viewed by the South African public as the ultimate crime fighters. The
DSO investigation into the “arms deal” concluded by the South African
government in 1999, and its investigation of the role of the deputy
president in this deal, upped this public profile considerably.
In the course of these investigations, the powerful position of
the national director has come into the spotlight, and questions
originally raised at inception of the DSO have re-emerged. How does the
DSO take on cases? Is it constitutional that the DSO is part of the
National Prosecuting Authority and not part of the South African Police?
Are there sufficient safeguards?
Despite a high public profile, these uncertainties, along with
limited public information about the DSO, have resulted in some
confusion and misconception. For one, the national director of public
prosecutions has been conflated in the public mind with the DSO. The aim
of this monograph is to correct misconceptions about the DSO, and to
provide information about an organisation which has rapidly become
extremely important in South Africa.
While the DSO is often likened to the US Federal Bureau of
Investigation, South Africa is quite unlike the US in terms of its
political and law enforcement structure. International comparison and
overview suggests some ways in which oversight and accountability over
the DSO could be better achieved. The information presented here was
gathered through interviews with DSO staff and external stakeholders,
and through research into internationally comparable institutions.