Monograph 91: Gender and Peacekeeping, Paul Higate

Gender relations in Peace Support Operations (PSOs) are
increasingly under the spotlight within the context of reports of the
sexual abuse of local women by peacekeepers across the range of
missions, involving a diversity of national military representatives.
This monograph, based on a small-scale exploratory and qualitative study
of the PSOs in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC) and Sierra
Leone (UNAMSIL) in April and May 2003, aims to contribute towards this
evidence base together with understandings of the exploitative aspects
of gendered relations in these two African PSOs. The report is concerned
with gender issues, with a focus on the dynamic between privileged and
powerful peacekeepers and local women and girls. Thus, findings
presented here should not be considered as representative of the range
of gendered relations in PSOs, but rather, are intended to deepen
understanding of the factors driving prostitution and allied forms of
exploitation in PSOs.
In highlighting the current environment surrounding
sexual abuse and exploitation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
(DRC) and Sierra Leone , the study involved in-depth interviews with 45
peacekeepers, UN civilian personnel and members of the civil society,
together with a significant number of informal discussions and
ethnography in and around the leisure sites of UN personnel and
peacekeepers. The research focus reflected the particular conditions in
the respective PSOs. In the DRC, the following themes were explored: the
context of the PSO, the culture and attitude of UN personnel and
peacekeepers towards the host population and vice versa, interpretations
of the concept of gender, consideration of gender raising strategies –
including gender training, peacekeepers engagement with prostitutes and
the functioning and understanding of the Code of Conduct. In Sierra
Leone, there was a focus on the context of this particular PSOs in terms
of the legacy of, and response to the UNHCR/SCFUK report (2002)
detailing allegations of sexual abuse of refugees by humanitarian
workers and peacekeepers, the workings of the UNAMSIL Personal Conduct
Committee (UPCC), prostitution involving peacekeepers, and finally,
gendered relations and peacekeeper national culture.
One of the more significant similarities between the
post conflict settings of the DRC and Sierra Leone concerned the ways
in which women and children (and some men) had been sexually abused
through the use of mass rape of the young and old. This ‘instrument of
war’ resonated widely throughout the more vulnerable elements of the
population, causing considerable long-term psychological and physical
damage. Within the DRC, and less obviously in Sierra Leone , members of
the civil society made the observation that peacekeepers occupied a
powerful and privileged position, particularly when considering the
vulnerabilities of a large number of the populace. The research
highlights the impression on behalf of local populations that a number
of peacekeepers and UN personnel encountered during the course of the
study displayed ‘expatriate’ views and beliefs and conveyed a position
of authority and power over a host population. Moreover, the issue of
sharp financial disparity between peacekeepers and host populations
provides peacekeepers with an opportunity to exert power and authority
over those weakened by conflict and thus vulnerable to exploitation and
abuse. Implementing gender training strategies, such as in MONUC, while
difficult to appraise, is a more proactive approach to stemming SEA. In
Sierra Leone, however, while awareness of the ‘gender issue’ was greater
than in the DRC—not least through the work of the UPCC—the lack of a
Gender Affairs Office and full-time dedicated officer implies that the
mission is more reactive to allegations of SEA. Both PSOs, not unlike
other missions, were characterised by the existence of a ‘peacekeeping
economy’ that sustained a range of gendered relations including those
understood to be more exploitative. The extremes of inequality that
developed in tandem with evidence of a colonial disposition towards the
host population represented the political economy of UN intervention in
these PSOs.
Evidence for continuing sexual exploitation was
apparent in both PSOs. In the DRC, it appeared that peacekeeper-local
woman liaisons were considerably less discrete than those occurring in
Sierra Leone . Here there was evidence that the UNHCR/SCFUK report had
both positive and negative outcomes in terms of raising awareness,
whilst driving some exploitation underground. The impact of national
cultures was also evident in a number of ways, including the exemplar
case of one battalion in Sierra Leone that made it their duty to ensure
that the breasts of local women in outlying villages were removed from
view and covered up.
This exploratory research has demonstrated a number
of weaknesses in the response to continued sexual exploitation. The
research report culminates with a number of recommendations including:
-
The need for more research into the cultural dimensions of PSOs;
-
The ongoing and increasing development of in-mission gender awareness training;
-
A more transparent and robust response by the leadership to allegations of sexual abuse by peacekeeping personnel;
-
The education of key, senior personnel in issues arising from sexual abuse;
- The establishment of a multi-agency group to oversee policy and practice;
-
A sharpening of the various Codes of Conduct in
order that ambiguities and tensions between the notions of
‘prostitution’ and ‘bona fide relationship’ be removed;
-
An appraisal of the work of committees attempting to curtail these exploitative activities;
-
The need for effective action on mainstreaming gender in PSOs;
-
The need for more women represented in
PSOs, particularly in the military and police components, as well as at
the strategic and decision-making levels;
- Overall action on recommendations made by the
UN, including those by the Department of Peacekeeping Operations itself
in ‘Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective’ (2000).
While there have been considerable advances in
raising awareness of the vulnerable position of women and children,
including the groundbreaking UN Resolution 1325, this tends not to have
been followed-up by decisive action. The report is suggestive of the
continued force of a military-masculine culture embedded into delicate
diplomatic issues linked to resource provision and the dispositions of
troop contributing countries. Analysis presented here turns on the
long-term socio-economic and political security of post-conflict
societies together with the appropriate response to all members of the
population, including women and children who have suffered most during
and after the conflict, and have the biggest stake in the peace.