Monograph 25: Connecting Weapons With Violence: The South American Experience, By Khatchik Der Ghoughassian snd Leandro Piquet Carneir

Conventional weapons systems, so decisive in
conflicts where military is pitched against military, have little real
effect in maintaining the security of civilian populations during and
after wars. The majority of casualties, of abuses of authority and of
indiscriminate killings are caused by the availability and use of small
arms.
Since small arms and light weapons, which include
landmines, machine guns, grenades, pistols and rocket launchers, are
standard issue during violent conflict and are not normally controlled
during post-conflict processes, the potential of these weapons for
illegal use – and abuse – is substantial. Because conflict resolution
processes depend on socio-economic development, effective democracy and
security (as seen in a credible law and order structure), these remedies
require time and stability for their successful implementation. If
there is indiscriminate access to the tools of violence (i.e., weapons),
stability will be harder to maintain and development in time of peace
will not take place.
Seldom, if ever, have all weapons been collected at the end
of an armed struggle. Physical security, primacy and economic necessity
generate the force that propels the trade in small arms
a trade that no longer requires a new influx of weapons to be
destabilising. It depends instead on the constant, ever-widening circles
of distribution of the massive stocks already in existence.
THE TOWARDS COLLABORATIVE PEACE PROJECT AT THE INSTITUTE FOR SECURITY STUDIES
One of the legacies of conflict in Southern Africa is the
glut of light weapons and small arms. These weapons are being
transported illegally across borders, where they are used to generate
political instability and to carry out crimes in many rural and urban
areas in the region. Under these circumstances, democratisation
programmes (which include demobilisation, disarmament and policing) are
being jeopardised to the point that most people feel the need to acquire
weapons for self-defence. In consequence, communities have abandoned
their traditional, negotiated mechanisms of conflict-resolution and
conflict-management, seeking instead to resolve violent situations with
solutions equally violent. Although in its infancy, a culture of
violence has begun to emerge in the region, threatening democracy and
development as a result.
With this context in mind, the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) in South Africa has developed its Towards Collaborative Peace
(TCP) project which aims to study the dynamics of the illegal trade in
small arms in Southern Africa. In the course of this study, the TCP
project will demonstrate the linkages between an increased availability
of small arms and the emergence of a culture of violence in transit and
end-user societies. The countries in the geographic region chosen manifest a number of similarities which permit their linkage for the
purpose of this study. Thus, all are either victims of the violence
accompanying small arms proliferation or act as transit points from
where weapons are distributed further afield. Likewise, all have been
affected, to a greater or lesser extent, by the existence of porous
borders which connect them to nation-states that have accumulated a
massive surplus of light weapons as a result of decades of internal
strife and ill-managed disarmament operations during multinational peace
processes (i.e., Angola, Mozambique). A final point of connection is
that all countries in the study are members of the same regional and
sub-regional organisations, namely the Organisation for African Unity
(OAU) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC).
The project, therefore, seeks to discover what is the nature of
the small arms proliferation problem in all of these countries; how
increased availability of weapons is affecting the societies; and what
structures within existing regional groupings could be utilised to
diminish the flow and effects of light weapons proliferation in Southern
Africa. Furthermore, the project seeks to implement a south-south
approach in dealing with this issue by contrasting the existing trends
in Southern Africa with the southern part of South America.
The TCP project has several components of which the most
important are field research, and the publication of a series of books
and monographs, the end result of which will be to propose viable
mechanisms for both the regional control of weapons flows and the
reversal of a culture of violence at local level.
The main purpose of the field research is to establish what the
impact of ineffectual demobilisation and disarmament is in countries
such as Mozambique and Angola; and what the effects are of the resulting
excess of weapons on the surrounding countries. Particular attention is
being focused on the way the light weapons, available in such massive
amounts, pervert the societies through which the weapons transit in
order to determine if a culture of violence follows in the wake of such
indiscriminate proliferation of light weapons. The examples uncovered in
the field research so far touch upon such diverse societal elements as
demobilised soldiers, refugees and other migrant communities, rural
communities and urban populations of Southern Africa.
If the TCP project`s field research is beginning to show why
light weapons should be more effectively controlled in Southern Africa,
its publications highlight the underlying reasons for the occurrence of
the proliferation of light weapons, the present dynamics of light
weapons proliferation and the way in which existing regional structures
could be used to stem the flows. There are four books in the TCP project
series, and a number of monographs. The books looks at the global
environment in which the proliferation of weapons occurs and the causes
for such a proliferation in Southern Africa, the existing regional
mechanisms that might be utilised as control vehicles for stemming the
proliferation of light weapons in Southern Africa, and the culture of
violence which has emerged as a result of ineffectual controls and easy
availability of light weapons in the region. The final volume will
produce a series of recommendations for improvement of control
mechanisms at regional level and for reversal of the culture of violence
locally.
To accompany the set of books, the project is publishing a
series of monographs, of which this is the second. These are designed to
produce a comprehensive view of the actual status of small arms
proliferation nationally and to cover general issues which are relevant
to the ultimate recommendations of the entire project. Thus the
monograph series includes research on the status of weapons flows in
Namibia, Angola, Botswana, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Mozambique and
Swaziland. Other issues which will be covered in the monograph series
include a study of comparative legislation for firearm ownership and use
a discussion of voluntary weapons collection programmes, often known as
gun buy-backs. This monograph, Connecting Weapons with Violence: The South Ameican Experience
focuses in its first part on the availability and patterns of
distribution of firearms in South America, specifically those countries
which belong to the Southern Common Market (Mercosur), Argentina,
Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. The second and third parts discuss
emerging cultures of violence in Buenos Aires, Argentina and Rio de
Janiero, Brazil, respectively. The role of weapons in this increasing
violence is explored as are attitudes towards firearms ownership and
use.
Since the project brings applied research to the field of light
weapons control, it does not stop at field research and writing. Two
further components of the project deal with proposing specific
recommendations for application at the levels of regional organisation
and local community. The channel for implementing the first type of
recommendation is a set of workshops and conferences designed as
inter-agency discussions between point persons dealing with weapons
control at national and regional levels. The second type of
recommendation focuses on the creation of an educational package to be
applied by local communities for the reversal of a culture of violence
that has been radically influenced by the use of firearms. This package
will be implemented via a pilot project set up near Johannesburg. This
model for the control of weapons and the reversal of the culture of
violence will be observed and documented and the results will be
included in the last volume in the Towards Collaborative Peace book
series.
This project, therefore, is a first look at a complex problem,
one that is so multi-layered that decision makers often are deterred
from taking effective action. In gaining some understanding of certain
aspects of the problem of the proliferation of small arms, the ISS,
through its TCP project, hopes to highlight the nature of the problem
and to offer insights for its resolution.
Virginia Gamba
Halfway House, March 1998
ENDNOTES
As exemplified in J Boutwell et al., Lethal Commerce: The Global Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995; and in J Singh (ed.), Light Weapons and International Security, Indian Pugwash Society and British American Security Information Council, New Delhi,1995
South Africa, Mozambique, Swaziland, Namibia, Angola, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Zambia, and Tanzania.