Slow and Steady: South Africa and the Convention on Cluster Munitions
Calls to curb the use of cluster weapons have gained momentum since the conflict in Lebanon in 2006, where it is believed Israel dropped 4.3 million sub-munitions on Lebanese soil. De-mining agencies estimated some one million cluster munitions failed to explode, which continue to pose an ongoing risk to civilians.
Gugu Dube, Researcher, Arms Management Programme, ISS Pretoria Office
The United Nations General Assembly First Committee on Disarmament and
International Security is currently underway at the UN
Headquarters in New York until 1 November 2011. This Committee is concerned
with disarmament and related international security matters and includes discussions
on the curbing of cluster munitions.
Africa accounts for nearly a third of the
countries affected by cluster munitions – Uganda, Angola, Chad, the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC), Eritrea, Ethiopia, Sierra Leone, Sudan, and the area
known as Western Sahara are all affected. The damage caused by cluster
munitions used in past conflicts further contributes to human insecurity and
hinders development on the continent.
Cluster munitions are air or ground-launched
canisters that contain up to 650 individual sub-munitions. They are notorious
for the explosive remnants of war they produce. Although generally designed to
explode on impact, the sub-munitions often fail to do so, and often detonate at
a later stage causing death and injuries. Calls to curb the use of cluster
weapons have gained momentum since the conflict in Lebanon in 2006, where it is
believed Israel dropped 4.3 million sub-munitions on Lebanese soil. De-mining
agencies estimated some one million cluster munitions failed to explode, which
continue to pose an ongoing risk to civilians.
In May 2008, over 100 governments
participating in the Dublin Diplomatic Conference formally adopted the text of
the Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM). The convention was then signed at a
meeting in Oslo that took place from 3 to 4 December 2008 and it entered into force
on 1 August 2010. To date, 111 states have signed the CCM and 66 are states
parties - of which 18 are African states.
This is the culmination of what has become
known as the Oslo Process – a procedure similar to the Ottawa Process, which
resulted in the 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling,
Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction.
The Republic of South Africa is a
signatory to the CCM. In May 2011, a government official said that the
Department of International Relations and Co-operation and the Department of
Justice and Constitutional Development had assessed the convention to ensure
that it did not contravene any domestic or international laws that South Africa
adheres to. In June 2011, South Africa informed states parties that
ratification of the convention “will soon be referred to the Parliament for
consideration” and said, “we are fully committed to implementation of all provisions” of the convention.
South Africa participated throughout the Oslo
Process that created the convention and its policy evolved to support a
comprehensive ban on cluster munitions. South Africa has continued to actively
engage in the work of the convention. It hosted a regional meeting on cluster
munitions in Pretoria in March 2010. South Africa attended the First Meeting of
States Parties to the Convention on Cluster Munitions in Vientiane, Lao PDR in
November 2010, where it made a statement on transparency reporting. South
Africa also participated in the convention’s first intersessional meetings in
Geneva in June 2011, where it provided an update on ratification. At both
meetings, South Africa chaired sessions to discuss international cooperation
and assistance in its capacity as “Friend of the President” of the First
Meeting of States Parties. Over the past year, civil society groups in South
Africa have undertaken a range of activities in support of the Convention on Cluster
Munitions.
South Africa is also party to the Convention
on Conventional Weapons (CCW). The National Assembly approved ratification of
CCW Protocol V on explosive remnants of war on 10 November 2010; but as of
early August 2011, South Africa had not deposited the ratification instrument.
South Africa has actively participated in CCW deliberations on cluster
munitions in recent years. In November 2010, South Africa supported a
continuation of CCW work on cluster munitions, but also affirmed the need for
all countries to join the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
South Africa has not yet revealed the precise
size and composition of its current stockpile. It is thought to stockpile the
M2001 155mm artillery projectile, produced by Denel, which contains 42
dual-purpose improved conventional munition (DPICM) submunitions with
self-destruct devices. South Africa has acknowledged possessing a type of
aerial cluster bomb called TIEKIE, which was degraded for training use only.
South Africa has stated that it “…has a
relatively small stockpile of obsolete cluster munitions that have already been
earmarked for destruction.” In July 2011, a government official stated that the
Department of Defence has started to prepare a plan to destroy the cluster
munition stockpile, including the timeframe and method for destruction, as well
as estimated financial cost. South Africa is likely to retain “a relatively
small stockpile” of cluster munitions for training purposes, but the official
clarified that only inert cluster munition casings would be retained and not
the explosive content.
As part of the UN meeting mention above, during
a recent general debate on conventional weapons, the South African delegation
stated that ‘it is ready to work with all members of the UN and civil society –
with a view to support substantive progress on the multilateral disarmament
agenda. Also, in order to strengthen the multilateral system of governance
aiming at enhancing international peace and security, thereby contributing
towards sustainable development’.
It is critical that all African CCM States
continue their commitment to the CCM process in order to ensure that the CCW
outcome does not undermine the CCM.