President Zuma, Gun Ownership and What the Crime Trends Tell Us
On Sunday 25 October 2009 at a political rally in Limpopo province, South African President Jacob Zuma publicly raised concerns about the number of firearms in the hands of private citizens. In a move that is sure to anger the pro-gun lobby, Zuma suggested that a review of legislation governing firearm ownership was necessary in light of the country’s crime challenges and the number of legally owned firearms stolen from citizens.
Andrew Faull, Researcher, Crime and Justice Programme, ISS Pretoria
On Sunday 25 October 2009 at a political rally in Limpopo province,
South African President Jacob Zuma publicly raised concerns about the
number of firearms in the hands of private citizens. In a move that is
sure to anger the pro-gun lobby, Zuma suggested that a review of
legislation governing firearm ownership was necessary in light of the
country’s crime challenges and the number of legally owned firearms
stolen from citizens. President Zuma’s comments were made in the
context of the recent conclusion of a nationwide civilian firearms
license renewal process, and legal action against the state by certain
firearm owners and firearm interest groups in relation to the
consequences of this renewal process.
In recent research exploring the dynamics of house robberies and
robbers, Dr. Rudolph Zinn of Unisa found that 97% of respondents used
firearms in the commission of their crime. More than half of these
perpetrators reported personally stealing licenced firearms.
Although over the past nine years South Africans have seen a general
decline in overall levels of crime, the categories of business
robberies, house robberies, and car hijacking have all increased
considerably. Due to their violent and interpersonal nature, government
views this “trio” of crimes as disproportionately responsible for
citizen perceptions and fear of crime, and has thus prioritized them.
It is not surprising that according to the SAPS, firearms were used in
the commission of 87% of business robberies, 77% of house robberies and
57% of street robberies in the 2008/09 financial year.
Firearms also play a significant role in murder in South Africa.
Research into murder trends conducted by the Centre for the Study of
Violence and Reconciliation in 2008 found 54% of 1149 murders were
committed using firearms. This trend mirrors data in the National
Injury Mortality Surveillance System which show that 53% of murders
between 2000-2004 were committed using firearms.
It has previously been found that between 1994 and 2003, a
staggering 208 090 firearms were lost by, or stolen from licensed gun
owners. However, the number of firearms stolen or lost year-on-year has
decreased steadily since 1999. This is likely the result of
improvements in legislation and has seen government clamp down on
firearm regulation and ownership.
In 2004 the Firearms Control Act came into effect leading to a
massive process of reapplication for firearm licenses and the
relinquishing of thousands of firearms into SAPS custody. Part of this
process included a firearm amnesty period in 2005 during which 100 006
firearms were collected, 53 435 of which were illegally possessed by
the owners. The Firearms Control Act has been criticized by the pro-gun
lobby for impeding the rights of citizens to defend themselves.
The implementers of the Firearms Control Act are the SAPS, mandated
both with seizing and destroying illegal firearms, as well as managing
the firearm licensing process. It is difficult to gauge the current
effectiveness of the SAPS in addressing illegal firearms. On the one
hand the national police body appear to be winning the battle against
illegal firearms. Statistics released by the SAPS in September suggest
that more firearms were recovered (13 675) in the 2008/09 financial
year than were lost (12 883). This 106% recovery rate is up from 85% in
2007/08.
However, earlier in 2008, the then Ministry of Safety and Security
revealed in parliament that 8 286 previously recovered firearms were
lost by the SAPS in the past three years. Only 900 of these were
recovered. Additionally, between April and March 2008 the SAPS had 329
state firearms stolen and lost another 183. Theft and loss of high
caliber weapons such as the R-series rifles are of particular concern
as these are increasingly used in unison with AK47s in brazen cash
heists and business robberies. Ironically state weapons in the hands of
criminals are increasingly responsible for the deaths of SAPS members
to whom they are meant to be issued.
For the pro-gun lobby a
gun-free South African is inconceivable – unattainable without the death
of tens of thousands of innocents deprived of their right to defend
themselves. For the anti-gun lobby a reduction in the number of firearms
in South Africa is central to creating a safe society where there is no
need for anyone to carry a firearm. President Zuma’s recent utterances
suggest a leaning towards the latter. An analysis of crime trends
suggests he should be supported and encouraged in this brave move.
At least for the foreseeable future the limited possession of
licensed firearms will have to be tolerated, while efforts at finding
and ridding our society of guns in the illegal pool should must
continue. At the same time, licensed gun owners should be held
accountable for negligent loss of firearms or for not protecting their
firearms in the manner prescribed by law.