Ashleigh Owen Adapted

From SONA to the street: what real dialogue in South Africa looks like

Whether national or local, dialogue is about listening, and doesn’t work as a once-off, performative undertaking.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa’s 12 February State of the Nation Address (SONA) closed with a reference to the National Dialogue initiated by his office in 2025. This was likely intended to convey that the government wished South Africa to be an inclusive and participatory society.

Dialogue should be one of the tools used to overcome the country’s many challenges. This is perhaps even more the case now than in 1955, when the Freedom Charter was crafted through dialogue.

Dialogue is necessary to build understanding, empathy and trust, especially when there is a diversity of perspectives and beliefs. It can be messy and difficult, and doesn’t work as a once-off, performative undertaking. It is particularly important at the local level to address issues as they arise, connect citizens with the state and prevent an escalation of problems that could lead to violence or insecurity.

When based on an ethic of care, dialogue that resolves conflict and builds citizens’ capacity to solve their own problems in collaboration with one another and the state, is possible – and the results are encouraging.

Dialogue builds understanding, empathy and trust, especially when there is a diversity of perspectives

Four years ago, a dialogue started across race and class lines in Hoekwil and Touwsranten, on the outskirts of George in Western Cape Province. This small peri-urban community, like many others in South Africa, faces various social and developmental challenges. Born out of a concern about crime and violence, the Community Dialogue is convened jointly by the author and others from the community.

The approach draws on the experience of the national Violence Prevention Forum (VPF), convened by the Institute for Security Studies. Since 2015 the VPF has brought together professionals from government, non-governmental organisations, academic institutions and the private sector to collaborate and use their collective knowledge and skills to prevent violence.

The Community Dialogue first convened in August 2021 and was attended by community and South African Police Service (SAPS) members. Despite our differences in background and income levels, we examined together the problems that undermined our sense of safety.

We established values for engagement that are still being applied four years later. We have found our way through conflict and difference, overcome bullies and gatekeepers and constructively engaged local government to address practical problems. These ranged from sanitation to the need for recreational infrastructure and income generation; from heavy-handed and racist practices by a local security company to alcohol and drug abuse.

Dialogue that resolves conflict and builds problem-solving capacity is possible, and the results are encouraging

As an established, inclusive structure, the Community Dialogue provided a credible basis from which to ask for support from the municipality, Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority, SAPS and Western Cape Police Ombudsman. The shared commitment is to a healthy, safe community for all.

Some of our efforts have been successful, some not – either because an initiative ran out of steam or an idea did not align with reality. But through it all, we have kept talking, building relationships and seeking solutions. Solving local problems requires tenacity and determination, and an acceptance that there will be failures and times when nothing happens.

Every month when the Community Dialogue meets, the local SAPS sector commander gives an update on crime in the area. In January 2025, after the festive season – usually a peak time for crime and violence in South Africa – the community experienced an all-time low in all forms of crime in the area.

However, drug dealing targeted at the youth, copper wire theft and allegations of police corruption have recently increased, raising concerns about a new presence of organised crime elements in the community.

Copper plumbing connections are being stolen from houses, and old telephone poles and new electricity poles are being torn down at night. Their wires yield copper when the thick black plastic coating is burnt off. The daytime air in some parts of Hoekwil and Touwsranten is thick with the toxic smell of burning plastic.

National dialogue should have roots in local communities and be led by credible conveners and skilled facilitators

We don’t yet know how to solve these problems, but the community has a forum to raise concerns with trusted police members. We have experience in mobilising local government, and we know we can work together.

This brings hope and enables agency, and is only possible because we slowly and patiently built the trust necessary to overcome differences. This is the basis of resilience and active citizenry – and represents the kind of dialogue South Africa needs.

This approach is likely to be far more beneficial than large, expensive, once-off, performative national dialogues that cost the state and citizens millions of rand, and where there is little real listening and a lot of posturing. Effective dialogue requires hearing different views, experiences and beliefs. This takes time.

The National Dialogue referred to by Ramaphosa could consider lessons from the Community Dialogue. Launched with much fanfare in mid-2025, the national process aims to ‘reimagine our future and forge a new social compact for our country’s development’ through a ‘citizen-led’ process. But the Presidency’s lead role in establishing its complex infrastructure, along with the high cost, have tainted the dialogue with questions of legitimacy and trust.

SONA presented a good vision for the future. But this can only be achieved if the state’s current weakness is countered by active citizenry supported by meaningful dialogue. For a national dialogue to work and build trust, it should have roots in local communities, be led by credible non-partisan conveners, be skilfully facilitated and be given time.


For permission to re-publish ISS Today articles, please email us. In Nigeria, Premium Times has exclusive rights to republish ISS Today articles.

Development partners
Exclusive rights to re-publish ISS Today articles have been given to Daily Maverick in South Africa and Premium Times in Nigeria. For media based outside South Africa and Nigeria that want to re-publish articles, or for queries about our re-publishing policy, email us.
Related content