How the public can help choose police leaders

ISS and Corruption Watch are calling for a merit-based recruitment process for top positions.

Prospective judges are rigorously vetted in a public nomination and selection process conducted by the Judicial Services Commission. Recently, Parliament held transparent and public participatory processes in the appointment of the new Public Protector, human rights commissioners and other heads of Chapter Nine institutions.

But in other appointments, such as that of the national police commissioner, the president has the prerogative to appoint individuals to this position with little or no transparency and without any public or parliamentary participation. The history of presidential appointments, and the calibre of individuals selected to lead key criminal justice institutions, raise the question of whether these appointment processes need to change. 

This event is hosted by the the Catholic Parliamentary Liaison Office in partnership with the Institute for Security Studies and Corruption Watch.

Speakers:

Kavisha Pillay, Project Manager, Corruption Watch

Gareth Newham, Justice and Violence Prevention Programme, ISS

Parliamentary speaker (TBC) 

Picture: GroundUp Images

Development partners
This event is made possible through funding from the Hanns Seidel Foundation. The ISS is also grateful for support from the following members of the ISS Partnership Forum: the Hanns Seidel Foundation and the governments of Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the USA.
Related content