Farm Attacks and Farm Murders Remain a Concern
Why are ongoing attacks and murders on South African farms no longer a priority for the government, especially at a time when the crisis in commercial agriculture is deepening, with a concomitant threat to our food security?
Johan Burger,
Senior
researcher, Crime and Justice Programme, ISS Pretoria
The ongoing scourge of
criminal attacks on the farming community in South Africa and the accompanying
range of violent crimes such as murder, rape and robbery remain a controversial
issue. On the one hand there are those who argue that farmers are more at risk
of being targeted by violent criminals than the average citizen. This includes
those who represent organised agriculture. Some go as far as claiming that
there is a political motive behind these attacks, with the objective of forcing
white farmers off the land. Indeed, people like Dr Gregory Stanton of Genocide
Watch go even further and claim that the nature and extent of farm murders show
worrying signs of genocide. On the other hand, there are those who argue that
the criminal victimisation of farmers is no different than that faced by South
Africans in general.
The absence of proper
statistics contributes to the confusion and lack of clarity on the issue. For
example, the South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR), using
statistics inter alia from the
Transvaal Agricultural Union of South Africa (TAUSA), concluded in a press
statement on 5 October 2012 that farmers were not uniquely vulnerable to armed
attacks when compared to the general population. However, a week later on 11
October, the SAIRR announced that on the basis of new information received it
was prepared to concede that farmers (exclusive of their families and workers) were
‘twice as likely’ to be murdered in South Africa than ordinary citizens.
Back in 1997 the South
African Government used to believe that farmers were ‘uniquely’ targeted for
violent and murderous attacks. Given that farms play a crucial role in ensuring
the country’s food security, in 1997 the Minister of Safety and Security,
Sydney Mufamadi, called for a joint task team comprising members of the South
African Police Service (SAPS), the South African National Defence Force (SANDF)
and organised agriculture to develop a plan to improve security on farms. This
resulted in what became known as the Rural Protection Plan (RPP) in the same
year. In 1999 a Joint Operational and Intelligence Structure (JOINTS) Priority
Committee on Rural Safety chaired by a senior police officer with the rank of
Major General was established to ensure that rural safety was managed as a
national security priority. The seriousness of the situation caused the SAPS to
include figures for farm attacks and murders in its annual reports from 2001/02
to 2006/07.
In 2001 the Minister of
Police directed the SAPS National Commissioner to establish a Committee of
Inquiry into farm attacks. In 2003 the Committee published its findings that,
among others, 89,3% of the attacks against farms were primarily criminal in
nature for the purposes of robbery, with no evidence being found to support
allegations that there were political motives behind these crimes.
Then President Thabo Mbeki,
without any consultation or prior warning, announced the closing down of the
‘commandos’, the cornerstone of the RPP. He stated that the SAPS would replace
the commandos with an alternative system consisting of police reservists, crime
combating units and sector policing. The SAPS in its annual reports after 2006/07
stopped reporting on farm attacks and murders and a new Rural Safety Strategy
(RSS) was adopted in 2011. The RSS is not focused on the security of farms, but
is aimed at rural security in general. In essence this means that the government
no longer regards farm security as a priority.
Was the government right to stop
prioritising farm security? According to the Report of the Committee of Inquiry,
there were 6 122 farm attacks in the decade between 1991 and 2001, resulting in
1 254 murders. The murder rate during
farm attacks more than doubled from 66 cases in 1991 to 142 in 1998, and
thereafter remained virtually unchanged until 2001. In 2001 the ratio of
murders to attacks was approximately one murder for every seven attacks.
According to
the SAPS’ annual reports for the period between 2001/02 and 2006/07, attacks
declined by 40% from 1 069 in 2001/02 to 636 in 2005/06. However, in 2006/07,
the last year that the SAPS published this information, the number of farm
attacks increased by almost 25% to 794 cases, resulting in 86 murders. Since
then the only available database on farm attacks and murders is kept by TAUSA,
although it does not have the capacity or capability to monitor the situation
as extensively as the SAPS had done. This is because TAUSA is not informed of
attacks on smallholdings, where up to 40% of attacks classified as ‘farm
attacks’ occur. So, for example, in 2007
TAUSA recorded 94 attacks and 60 murders, while the SAPS recorded 794 attacks
and 86 murders across the country.
However commendable its efforts,
the inability of TAUSA to capture the full extent of attacks on farms and
smallholdings means that it is probably under-reporting on a situation that is
worse than its figures suggest. According to TAUSA’s figures for the period
2008 to September 2012, there were 634 farm attacks resulting in 306 murders.
This amounts to an average of one murder during every second attack. This
compares badly to urban residential robberies where there is one murder in
every two hundred attacks, on average.
According to TAUSA, most of
the murder victims are the farmers themselves, followed by their spouses and
other direct family, their workers and, in a few cases, visitors to farms. For
example, of the 37 murders for the first nine months of 2012, 25 were farmers,
8 were spouses or other direct family, 3 were workers and 1 was a visitor.
The seriousness of farm murders becomes particularly
apparent when one compares the murder rate of farmers to that of all South
Africans. According to Statistics South Africa’s Census of Commercial
Agriculture, there were 32 375 commercial farmers (i.e. people running farming
operations either full-time or part-time) in South Africa in 2007, but this
number is dropping. According to Pieter Mulder, the deputy minister for
agriculture, the number of commercial farmers has declined by more than 50%
since 1996. ABSA’s
head of agribusiness, Ernst Janovsky, predicts that commercial farmer numbers
will decline to 15 000 individuals over the next fifteen years, causing
significant job losses in rural areas.
Using the latest available figures from 2007, the
murder of 32 farmers (exclusive of their families and workers) in 2011 provides
a murder ratio of 98,8 killings per 100 000. This is over three times higher
than South Africa’s national average of 30,9 murders per 100 000 in that year
and 14 times the global average of 6,9 murders per 100 000.
South African farmers are almost twice as likely to be
murdered as police officials, where a ratio of 51 murders per 100 000 was recorded
during 2011/12. This was enough of a concern for the Minister of Police to host
a national summit on police killings in July 2011, which resulted in a ‘Ten
Point Implementation Plan’ to address this problem.
So why are the murders of farmers not being
prioritised by the government? There is already a crisis in commercial
agriculture and these attacks are making it worse. If this situation continues
it will have a very negative impact on the rural economy and South Africa’s
food security. It is crucially important
for government to prioritise the security of our farming community and to
resume the monitoring and reporting of these attacks and murders. We will all
be worse off if the government continues to ignore this pressing problem.