ISS Seminar, Addis Ababa: Seminar on the relationship between the AU Peace and Security Council and the UN Security Council
Date: 2011-05-19
Venue: , Desalegn Hotel,
Addis Ababa
Hosted by the Peace and Security Council Report Programme (PRP) of the
ISS in partnership with the Security Council Report (SCR)
Introduction
This
first PRP seminar was aimed at facilitating discussions and debate on the
growing relations between the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and the
African Union Peace and Security Council (PSC) with a focus on the development
and challenges of the relationship.
Since the establishment of the African Union and more
particularly the operationalization of the Peace and Security Council, the AU
has assumed a prominent role in the prevention, management and resolution of
conflicts on the continent. In order to achieve a coherent and coordinated
response to crisis situations in Africa and mobilize political and financial
support for its initiatives, the AU has established partnerships with a wide
range of international actors and partner countries. One of the most important
of such partnerships is the relationship between the AU and the United Nations
Organization (UN).
One aspect of this partnership involves the
interaction between members of the PSC and the Security Council of the UN
(UNSC). Given the responsibility of each in the maintenance of peace and security
on the continent and the potential value if productive synergies can be
achieved as a result of the partnership between the two organs, the
relationship between them is of very critical significance. The decisions of
these bodies may have serious consequences for the peace and security dynamics
of the continent. A common and coherent approach by the two bodies would
contribute tremendously to the resolution of conflicts in Africa. However, divergence
between the two bodies on issues of peace and security has the potential to
undermine efforts for the resolution of crisis situations on the continent.
Since 2007 the PSC and the UNSC have held annual
consultative meetings. The meetings take place alternatively in Addis Ababa and
New York. The most recent meeting was held on 21 May 2011, two days after this
seminar, at the AU Headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
The Seminar which was chaired by H.E Mr Mull S.
Katende, Ambassador of Uganda to Ethiopia and Permanent Representative to the
AU and the ECA, was opened by the Director of the ISS office in Addis Ababa,
Ambassador Olusegun Akinsanya. The ISS Director noted that there was a need to share
experiences between the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and the African
Union Peace and Security Council (PSC) on their global and continental mandates
and emphasised the benefit of the seminar as a platform for enhancing the
growing partnership between the two organs while creating an opportunity for
regular and open debate to discuss
issues around the critical roles of the
two councils in resolving existing and future conflicts in Africa. Ambassador
Akinsanya, who listed the various UN and AU documents defining the role and
working relations of the two Councils, urged that the engagement between the
two organs be more than a symbolic meeting of members each year.
The Key Note Address
The Director of the Peace and Security Department of
the African Union, Mr El-Ghassim Wane, delivered a keynote address which was
very well received by the other seminar participants. Mr Wane, who was very
candid and detailed in his presentation, set the tone for the seminar by articulating
the growing collaboration as well as the problems and frustration surrounding
the relations between the AU PSC and the UNSC. Mr Wane referred to Article VII of
the UN Charter which identifies international peace and security as the primary
responsibility of the UNSC. He expressed the view that interpretation of the
article should depend on specific situations of peace and security in a
creative and innovative reading of the relevant article. Mr Wane said that
three factors should be taken into account in the future relationship of the
UNSC and PSC. The first one, according to Mr Wane, is the development of the AU
peace and security normative and institutional rolls. He said that the AU had
become more proactive, dynamic and assertive, leaving less space for the UN to
engage in Africa amid the uneasiness of some member states of the UNSC.
Secondly the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) is in place .The
third point is the legitimacy of the UNSC as Africa does not have a permanent
seat at the UN Security Council. The keynote address which was a major part of
the seminar was generally commented upon by many participants, touching on such
issues as an envisaged Africa permanent seat at the UNSC and UN reforms, African
solutions for African problems and the need for harmony and better coordination
between African Ambassadors in Addis Ababa and their counterparts in New York.
Presentations
The first presentation was made by Mr Colin Stewart
who is the Chief of Staff and Deputy Head of the UN liaison office to the AU. Mr
Stewart said his office in Addis was relatively new and that by July 2011 would
have a full complement of staff numbering 63. He said that the problem of
relations between the UNSC and AU PSC boiled down to leadership. His
presentation focused on the moves by the UN in strengthening the relations between
the AU and UN. Mr Stewart admitted that the growing relations of the two organisations
faced many difficulties as articulated by Mr Wane and he emphasised that there
was no disagreement on the existence of such problems. He stressed however that
those discussions should preferably focus on what can and should be done to
resolve the tensions between the two bodies. He also talked about the leadership
of the UNSC and the dynamics between the members of the Security Council as
well as the protracted issue of the reform of the United Nations. Mr Stewart pointed
out that a high percentage of peace-keeping troops in Africa are not from
Africa. Mr Stewart also joined in the debate about the emerging role of the AU
in resolving continental security challenges in the light of fears by members of the UNSC that such a trend may
result in the ‘regionalisation/balkanisation of security’. He concluded his
presentation by stating that the UN remained very serious about seeing
improvement in its relations with the AU and that the prospect and momentum for
change was positive. He said the UN had no other regional relations that
resemble its current engagement with the AU.
The second presentation was by Mrs Joanna Weschler,
Deputy Executive Director and Director of Research for the Security Council
Report, based in New York. She noted that Africa dominated the agenda of the
UNSC and that recent years had witnessed a significant improvement in the
working relations and infrastructure of the two organs. She added that she
believed cooperation was moving impressively in the right direction and her concern
was about the leadership of the member states of the two organs. Mrs Weschler
also announced that her program had recently published an in-depth research
report on the relations of the two Councils funded by the Australian
Government. The Research Report concludes that relations between the two bodies
will improve in years to come. She also discussed practices for improving
partnerships such as the establishment of working groups on Africa that could
assist in improving ties. She said a recommendation had been made that the
working group on Africa functions as a secretariat and that it could, for
example, invite the AU Chair to go to New York to give briefings. The Chair of
the AU PSC could also invite the New York Permanent Representatives to visit
Addis Ababa annually in between meetings. She said that currently the AU PSC
and UNSC meet not as organs, but only as member states.
The third and final presentation was made by Dr
Solomon Ayele Dersso, a Senior Researcher with the Peace and
Security Council Report Programme of the ISS Addis Ababa office. His presentation focused on the
existing relations between the two Councils and on possible mechanisms and ways
to take the partnership to a much higher level.
He referred to Chapter 8 and Article 52 of the UN
Charter that imposes obligations and encourages the use of regional
organisations within an established setting. He noted that the AU is empowered
to intervene in other states in grave circumstances such as civil war or civil
conflict. He said the burden on the AU in terms of personnel and other
resources was essentially reduced through UN participation and that the way
forward came down to three specific choices: 1) maintaining the status quo with
no clarity or meeting of minds, a situation patently unfair to the AU; 2) an
informal non-institutionalised arrangement; and 3) a comprehensive redefinition
of the relationship between the two bodies. He said that the “how†and “whenâ€Â
questions needed to be addressed.
Discussions
and conclusion
The
presentations were followed by an interactive discussion, which centred on UN
reforms, issues of parity and other issues related to best practices of UN sanctions
applied in Africa. Some participants questioned whether the UN could be
reformed at all. Other questions focused on ownership by the AU on training and the capacity
building needs of the AU as well as regionalisation of security. In
general, seminar participants noted that the relations between the AU PSC and
UNSC are growing despite numerous challenges requesting genuine and speedy
solutions, mostly from the UN side.
Concluding
remarks were made by Dr Duke Kent Brown, Program Head of the Peace and Security Council Programme of the
ISS, Addis Ababa, in which he
hailed the success of the seminar and thanked donors and staff who have
supported the seminar and the ISS.